A few years ago comic book legend Neal Adams posted online a kind of science project of his, offering a theory (which he claims to have discovered, but really is is an old theory which Adams has resurrected and put a nice amount of time into explaining)about our earth that quite frankly makes perfect sense and explains a LOT to me, but I have yet to see anyone of any science renown embrace as THE explanation that Neal says it is.
The theory simply stated is that the Earth (as well as many, if not all, other planets are expanding, and that all the continents fit directly together if you shrink the earth down to a small(er) ball of crust. I like to explain it to folks like the old jiffy pop popcorn pans on a stove, only the earth is an entire sphere. Attached here for your looking over, is a small clip from Neal's film, a more fuller explanation can be found at his website www.nealadams.com, and it'll cost you 20 bucks for a month's free reign on all his materials and shorts. YouTube has a number of other clips from these films posted, but for the full story you'll need to fork over the 20...
Is he wrong? Personally I doubt it. Like I said, it makes perfect sense to me. It certainly would screw with most every one's perception of geology, astronomy, perhaps a little physics, but most of all religion (considering that most/some religions claim that the Earth is only 6-7 thousand years old- it seem to give God more importance that way...). To me it explains a LOT, especially when it comes to earthquakes, and if you looked at my earlier blogs it would also explain the force behind the Abiotic oil that pushes it to the surface of the Earth.
On a side note- what if the expanding Earth's middle is being filled with petroleum, and our pumping it out of the ground is actually GOOD for us as a species and in whatever way is keeping the planet from expanding, or at least slowing said expansion down. Are there REALLY more earthquakes happening over the last few decades, or are our equipment to record them just getting more sensitive?
On a further side note- I bring this to your attention because I think it means that we should RE think a LOT of what we take for granted and again, the explanation seems totally plausible to me, NOT because it's fostered by Neal Adams. I have a few Neal Adams stories (especially one personal one I witnessed first hand at a comic convention) that makes him one of my least favorite people (but he CAN draw and IS one of the few true comic MASTERS left on the face of this earth in my opinion), but I feel he gets a raw deal from his detractors on this theory and totally believe him to be spot on right about it.
As with everything I present here, I invite you to make up your own mind, just please do so with an open one, and feel free to comment,or discuss it here, and DEFINITELY see for yourself. I also firmly believe that most everything we blindly accept, or were "taught" in school (ANY school, including Sunday School) is totally bogus and mostly "spin" to make up believe some sheeple style viewpoint or another. In other words:
WAKE UP!
Sunday, August 10, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment